Hey bubblebrain. Here's your precious "jurisdiction:"
"In Illinois, standing requires only some injury in fact to a legally cognizable interest and the injury, whether actual or threatened, must be distinct and palpable, fairly traceable to the defendant's actions, and substantially likely to be prevented or redressed by the...relief requested." In re D.W., 799 N.E.2d 410.
"Standing requries only some injury in fact to a legally cognizable interest." In re County Treasurer and Ex Officio County Collector of Cook County, 775 N.E.2d 86.
"This court has repeatedly held that standing requires some injury in fact to a legally recognized interest." In re Estate of Wellman, 673 N.E.2d 272, 276 (Ill. 1996).
"If a party is found to lack standing, the court is wihtout subject matter jurisdiction to determine the cause." Cadle Co. v. D'Addario, 844 A.2d 836.
"The general rule is that one party has no standing to raise another's rights." Security Ins. Co. of Hartford v. Lumbermens Mut. Ca. Co., 826 A.2d 107.
"A party cannot rightfully invoke the jurisdiction of the court unless he has, in an individual or representative capacity, some real interest in the cause of action, or a legal or equitable right, title or interest in the subject matter of the controversy. The burden rests with the party who seeks the exercise of jurisdiction in his favor to allege facts demonstrating that he is a proper party to invoke judicial resolution of the dispute and, has standing." Goodyear v. Discala, 849 A.2d 791.
__________
We have been over this stuff a million times. You lose, so fuck off.
__________________________
Like a forest bows to winter... Beneath the deep white silence... I will quietly resist
Like a flower in the desert... That only blooms at night... I will quietly resist - Rush
|
We received a letter yesterday about the fact that we posted a video where a delusional woman rants about Adam Lambert not being gay. We felt we should share it with the site, because it is pretty ridiculous and funny. Enjoy!
Seriously? So criticizing a video that someone posted of themselves is now considered cyber-bullying? Get a clue. No one cares about harassing this woman. And yes, she's 18, she's a woman who can make her own decisions. If she posts a video online, she needs to learn that she will be criticized for it, much in the same way this site is criticized every day by idiots like you. No one has cyberstalked her because no one here has contacted her or will ever contact her. The way she talks, it's highly doubtful she's even literate. She produced a second video that said "VFTW, this is for you" and we posted it on our site. What terrible people we are! Might as well lock us up for that. Listen here, numbnuts. If you don't want to be made fun of, don't post stupid stuff online. Will we even refer to Aperilla ever again? No. Because no one cares about her. But at least you now have your 15 minutes of fame, Xavier. Enjoy!
__________________________